🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Documents seen by journalists sent from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“As an elected official, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during broader worries about corporate intervention with health policies. Last month, global health authorities issued a warning that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to undermine international regulations.

“There is proof of corporate influence worldwide. Tobacco company fingerprints are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and mandating that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the company recommends this be reduced to 30% or 50% “according to global guideline limits”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the bill passes.

International experts in fact recommends a warning should cover at least half of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings need to encompass 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, suggesting that it would lead smokers to “illicitly sold” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation proposes sanctions for different infractions “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to ten-year jail sentences”.

Company justification

Via documentation, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary claims the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but maintains that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Activist reaction

Chimbala said the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.

“We reside in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to enrich myself and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are dying … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the Britain or other nations had not caused companies to close, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

The company representative stated: “The company operates its operations according with current country statutes. Moreover, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which allow for stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, they said, mentioning that underage people should be safeguarded against acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We champion progressive regulation to realize planned population health targets, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” they said, adding that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which encompasses increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was approached for comment.